Updated 62 Days ago
Neil LaBute latest directorial effort is Lakeview Terrace. LaBute’s earliest work (Your Friends & Neighbors, In the Company of Men) specialized in making the viewer uncomfortable. In that regard, Lakeview Terrace is something of a return to form. In past work, LaBute has made us squirm with gender issues. This time he uses race.
Samuel L. Jackson plays Abel Turner, a widower, single father and member of the LAPD. Turner is that rarest of mythical creatures, a Black conservative. His years on the force have exposed him to the seedier side of life. He has disdain for the “touchy-feely” side of liberalism and his views on race relations allow for integration at work but not much anywhere else. His reaction to the loss of his wife has been to retreat to the suburbs and guard his son and daughter in a manner that borders on militant. At first blush, he seems like one of those tough parents that a kid would be glad to have…once they’re no longer kids.
But as new neighbors move in next door, we start to see a new, uglier side of Turner. Chris and Lisa Mattson (played by Patrick Wilson and Kerry Washington) are an interracial couple (he’s White, she’s Black) and this doesn’t sit well with Turner. Turner sees Chris’ love of old school hip-hop as transparent example of trying too hard. And in Turner’s eyes, Chris’ love for his wife is little more than a condescending fetish for Black women. Turner and Chris have increasingly uncomfortable confrontations. First over Chris’ flicking of cigarettes and then over Turner’s placement of security lights that illuminate the Mattson’s bedroom.
The dialogue given to Jackson is masterfully crafted. He makes it clear that he’s not happy with his new neighbors’ interracial relationship. But he speaks with the nuance of the cagiest of politicians. Every time Chris tries to call out Turner’s racism, he ends up looking like the racist. Even his own wife starts to question just how colorblind her husband actually is. As Chris starts to look increasingly crazy and/or racist, it begins to strain their marriage. Chris’ father-in-law (played by Ron Glass, best remembered as Harris from Barney Miller) isn’t Chris’ biggest fan. But while the tension in their relationship is the same tension that any dad has watching his little girl grow up, Lisa starts to wonder if Chris’ opinion of Turner isn’t all that far removed from his opinion of her father.
As Turner ratchets up the heat on the Mattson’s, their previously blissful marriage begins to disintegrate. The movie does a wonderful job of showing how outside forces can undermine a marriage in unexpected ways.
As good as the movie is in spots, it ultimately disappoints. Unlike LaBute’s earlier works, Lakeview Terrace lets the viewer off the hook. LaBute is a controversial director because he elicits such strong reactions from people. In The Company Of Men starred Aaron Eckhart as the ugliest of misogynists. His character was presented so unflinchingly that people still debate whether or not it was the character or the movie that actually hated women. It was a good movie, but one difficult to watch. Lakeview Terrace could have been a similar film. But eventually the characters fall into easy-to-identify categories of “good guys” and “bad guys.” It would have been much more interesting if both sides had been a little bit right and a little bit wrong.
What could have been a fascinating exploration of an underexplored form of racism turns into your standard potboiler thriller. Which is a shame, because it was thisclose to being great.
On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being Pulp Fiction and 1 being The Man, Lakeview Terrace gets a 7.
Body Count, with "that guy from Law & Order"
What is reCAPTCHA?
reCAPTCHA is a free CAPTCHA service that helps to digitize books.A CAPTCHA is a program that can tell whether its user is a human or a computer. You've probably seen them Ñ colorful images with distorted text at the bottom of Web registration forms. CAPTCHAs are used by many websites to prevent abuse from "bots," or automated programs usually written to generate spam. No computer program can read distorted text as well as humans can, so bots cannot navigate sites protected by CAPTCHAs.
About 60 million CAPTCHAs are solved by humans around the world every day. In each case, roughly ten seconds of human time are being spent. Individually, that's not a lot of time, but in aggregate these little puzzles consume more than 150,000 hours of work each day. What if we could make positive use of this human effort? reCAPTCHA does exactly that by channeling the effort spent solving CAPTCHAs online into "reading" books.
To archive human knowledge and to make information more accessible to the world, multiple projects are currently digitizing physical books that were written before the computer age. The book pages are being photographically scanned, and then transformed into text using "Optical Character Recognition" (OCR). The transformation into text is useful because scanning a book produces images, which are difficult to store on small devices, expensive to download, and cannot be searched. The problem is that OCR is not perfect.
reCAPTCHA improves the process of digitizing books by sending words that cannot be read by computers to the Web in the form of CAPTCHAs for humans to decipher. More specifically, each word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is placed on an image and used as a CAPTCHA. This is possible because most OCR programs alert you when a word cannot be read correctly.
But if a computer can't read such a CAPTCHA, how does the system know the correct answer to the puzzle? Here's how: Each new word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is given to a user in conjunction with another word for which the answer is already known. The user is then asked to read both words. If they solve the one for which the answer is known, the system assumes their answer is correct for the new one. The system then gives the new image to a number of other people to determine, with higher confidence, whether the original answer was correct.
Currently, we are helping to digitize books from the Internet Archive and old editions of the New York Times.